This is also true of the speaker I met at Oxford. Furthermore, where Hegel takes the work of the negative to be dialectic's driving power, Deleuze declares that difference is thinkable only as repetition repeating itself as in Nietzsche's eternal returnwhere difference affirms itself in eternally differing from itself.
This view is called the correspondence theory of truth. But where modern art presents the unpresentable as a missing content within a beautiful form, as in Marcel Proust, postmodern art, exemplified by James Joyce, puts forward the unpresentable by forgoing beautiful form itself, thus denying what Kant would call the consensus of taste.
Their ghostly nature results from their absorption into a network of social relations, where their values fluctuate independently of their corporeal being. A consequence of achieved modernism is what postmodernists might refer to as de-realization.
Learn More! Page reference is to the reprinted translation of However, in philosophy, it signifies certain strategies for reading and writing texts. In this way, they are able to distinguish their projects from Heidegger's thinking and to critically account for his involvement with National Socialism and his silence about the Holocaust, albeit in terms that do not address these as personal failings.
Thus logic is born from the demand to adhere to common social norms which shape the human herd into a society of knowing and acting subjects. In postmodernism, hyperreality is the result of the technological mediation of experience, where what passes for reality is a network of images and signs without an external referent, such that what is represented is representation itself.
The Foucauldian method, invoking a hermeneutic of suspicion, works by unveiling or demystifying the relations of power that constitute claims to truth. Because at its functional level all language is a system of differences, says Derrida, all language, even when spoken, is writing, and this truth is suppressed when meaning is taken as an origin, present and complete unto itself.
Such is the paradoxical structure of historical transformation.